Cases 61 - 70 of 209
Haro #200988 v. Burger et al
as 2:2018cv02666
Defendant:
Colleen Oaks, Unknown Burger, Lisa McNeal and others
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Solis Haro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #190857 v. Ulibarri et al
as 2:2018cv02274
Defendant:
Betty Ulibarri, Charles L Ryan and Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Bennett Laquan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branum v. Three Sonz LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02247
Defendant:
Three Sonz LLC, Three Sonz IV LLC, Adnan Beydoun and others
Plaintiff:
Betty J Branum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Soliz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv01981
Plaintiff:
Betty Jane Soliz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04755
Plaintiff:
Bettie Jane Forbes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jensen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv04515
Plaintiff:
Betty Lou Jensen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Byrne v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04321
Plaintiff:
Betty L Byrne
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04143
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00544
Plaintiff:
Betty K Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
