Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Courter v. Conocophillips Pipeline Company
as 2:2010cv02337
Plaintiff:
Brad Courter
Defendant:
Conocophillips Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee County, Kansas et al
as 5:2010cv03098
Plaintiff:
Garry E. Williams
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee County, Kansas, Richard Kline, Shannon Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cline et al
as 5:2010cv03034
Petitioner:
Brad Joseph Jones
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Topp et al v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv02035
Plaintiff:
Mike Topp, Mike Topp, TT&T Salvage and Tow Service, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Craig Davis and Brad Gilges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arencibia v. Barta et al
as 2:2009cv02581
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Arencibia, Eduardo Arencibia and Eduardo Arencibia
Defendant:
Richard Barta, Tracey Trammel, Brad Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03171
Petitioner:
Brad Lee Jones
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hooks v. Martin et al
as 2:2009cv02167
Plaintiff:
Fernando F. Hooks and Fernando F. Hooks
Defendant:
Jace Martin, Robert Schluben, Brad Martens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lindsey v. Hillebert
as 5:2008cv03223
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Lindsey
Defendant:
Brad Hillebert
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Witteman et al
as 5:2007cv04128
Plaintiff:
George Milam Hall
Defendant:
Douglas P. Witteman, Douglas P. Witteman, Phillip M Fromme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
