Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Bush v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
Sandra D. Bush
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
Janice Bush and Barry Bush
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bush v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Shane D. Bush
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rochester v. Herlong et al
as 2:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
H. M. Herlong, U. S. Gov., R. S. Carr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bush v. American Benefit Corporation
as 3:2008cv01422
Plaintiff:
David Bush
Defendant:
American Benefit Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.) et al
as 2:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
Kevin Razzoli
Respondent:
Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.), Warden FCI Gilmer (Nominal), G W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson, et al.
as 2:2007cv00578
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Robert C. Byrd, John D. Rockefeller, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lori Beth Bush and Lori Beth Bush
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bush, et al. v. BJ Services Company, U.S.A., et al.
as 2:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Bush, Michael J. Bush, Gloria Bush and others
Defendant:
BJ Services Company, U.S.A. and BJ Services Equipment, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
