Cases 61 - 70 of 554
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Captain Blanton et al
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Randall Spencer
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Lt. Tremble, Sergeant Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Seminole County, Dennis Lemma, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Captain James et al
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Moultrie
Defendant:
Captain James and Officer Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Kirby et al
as 6:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Rodger Wayne Williamson
Defendant:
Sergeant J. Kirby, Aramark Corp., Governor Ron DeSantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Catches Restaurant, LLC
as 8:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Erik Parker
Defendant:
Catches Restaurant, LLC, Timonthy Lowe, Michael Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Holmes v. Grant et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Errick Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Lieutenant Grant, Officer Garrow, Sergeant Lok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv14066
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Captain Kent Campbell, Sergeant Christian Mathisen and Sheriff Deryl Loar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Lima et al
as 6:2022cv02336
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Sheriff L. Lima, Chief L. Bedard, Captain Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
