Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Lay et al v. Burley Stabilization Corporation
as 3:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Larry C. Lay , Roger Dale Philpott , Campbell P. Ridley, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Burley Stabilization Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00045
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00463
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
United States of America v. Cardinal Growth, L.P.
as 3:2011mc00014
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cardinal Growth, L.P.
United States of America v. Cardinal Growth, L.P.
as 1:2011mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cardinal Growth, L.P.
Glenn E. Daulton, Inc. v. Cardinal Towing, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02748
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.
Defendant:
Cardinal Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McVay v. Town of Nolensville et al
as 3:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Patricia McVay and Patricia McVay
Defendant:
Town of Nolensville, Kenneth Lee, Josh Cardin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lay et al v. Burley Stabilization Corporation
as 3:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Larry C Lay, Larry C Lay, Larry C Lay and others
Defendant:
Burley Stabilization Corporation, Burley Stabilization Corporation and Burley Stabilization Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
