Cases 61 - 70 of 2,062
(HC) Simmons v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01243
Petitioner:
Melvin Simmons, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Simmons v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Not Classified By Court:
Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lynn Waters v. B. Cates
as 2:2022cv05019
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Waters
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Cates et al
as 3:2022cv01101
Petitioner:
Ellis Bernard Scott
Respondent:
B. Cates and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cory Acker et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05044
Plaintiff:
Chris Stuckrath, Cory Acker, Jennifer Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
v. Newson et al
as 1:2022at00664
Defendant:
Gavin Newson, Brian Cates and C Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Larson v. Aln et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Harvey Eugene Larson
Defendant:
V. Aln, Miller, Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanloan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Vanloan
Defendant:
The Nation of Islam, Louis Farrafhan, Tony Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Womack v. Cates
as 5:2022cv03925
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Womack
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Jones v. Cates
as 1:2022cv00839
Petitioner:
Stepfon Jones
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
