Cases 61 - 70 of 128
United States of America v. Walker et al
as 4:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs Mary J Walker, Northeast Oklahoma Community Action Agency, Inc., State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Brett v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01574
Plaintiff:
Hiram Brett
Defendant:
Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thaler v. Amador County, California et al
as 2:2014cv02013
Plaintiff:
Carson Rhodes Thaler
Defendant:
Amador County, California, Amador County Counsel, Amador County Department of Health and Human Services/Department of Social Services/CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Rockett v. Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency et al
as 2:2014cv00638
Plaintiff:
Holly Rockett
Defendant:
Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency and Shelly Hance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rockett v. Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency et al
as 2:2014at00295
Plaintiff:
Holly Rockett
Defendant:
Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency and Shelly Hance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
