Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Cuevas v. Vasquez
as 1:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
Juan Cuevas
Respondent:
UP Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bates et al v. Laminack et al
as 2:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Frank Bates , Richard Brown , Bruce D Cochran and others
Defendant:
Richard N Laminack, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC d/b/a The O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Cuevas, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00585
Plaintiff:
Bella Cuevas and George Cuevas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Olson v. Garza
as 7:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Arlyn Olson
Defendant:
German Cueva Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
as 3:2011cv00180
Petitioner:
Michael Cuevas
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 4:2010cv04954
Plaintiff:
Cesar Cuevas
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. Board of Pardon and Parole, Texas
as 3:2010cv00266
Respondent:
Board of Pardon and Parole, Texas
Petitioner:
Michael Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cuevas v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
as 3:2010cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael Cuevas
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardon and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas-Rangel v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN CRIMINAL CASE #2:08cr509-1.
as 2:2010cv00036
Petitioner:
Martin Andres Cuevas-Rangel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
