Cases 61 - 70 of 468
Neeley v. Peterson Japan, LLC
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Ozy Jay Neeley
Defendant:
Peterson Japan, LLC d/b/a Peterson Lexus, an Idaho limited liability company and Peterson Japan, LLC an Idaho limited liability company doing business as Peterson Lexus
3Rd Party Defendant:
Fleet World LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pehringer v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Adam Ross Pehringer, SR
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Jason D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Future Motion Inc.
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
David D Brown
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts v. Valley
as 1:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Cameron D Watts
Respondent:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Jennings, et al.
as 4:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Sarah Stanley
Defendant:
Gary Lee Jennings, Laurie Baird Gaffney, Jeffery W. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Ada County Court, et al.
as 1:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
James V Samuels
Defendant:
Ada County Court, Christopher D Rich, Clerk of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Belcher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Camron D Belcher
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Timothy Mcay, Tyler Nickodemus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
