Cases 61 - 70 of 219
GIBBS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv04766
Petitioner:
TYRONE GIBBS
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and TM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAY v. MCVEIGH et al
as 2:2009cv04673
Plaintiff:
AARON GAY
Defendant:
CATHERINE MCVEIGH, JOHN & JANE DOE and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEED-ACKLES v. OFFICER TALIAFERRO et al
as 3:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
MAX-A-MILLION WALTER WEED-ACKLES
Defendant:
OFFICER TALIAFERRO and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv04408
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DICKERSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv04278
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN LEE HARRIS
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARD v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv04293
Petitioner:
THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
EVERETT v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009mc00150
Petitioner:
MAURICE EVERETT
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
STOVER v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009mc00146
Petitioner:
GREGORY STOVER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
POLITE v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv03966
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. ULISNY et al
as 2:2009cv03967
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MARTIN
Defendant:
KIM ULISNY, JOHN/JANE DOE, MICHAEL SPENCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
