Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Randolph v. US Attorney General Department of Justice
as 1:2015cv00916
Plaintiff:
Catherine Randolph
Defendant:
US Attorney General Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03865
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marsh v. United States Of America et al
as 8:2014cv03559
Plaintiff:
Guy Marsh
Defendant:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
OneWest Bank FSB v. United States of America, Department of Justice
as 1:2014cv02891
Plaintiff:
OneWest Bank FSB
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Amos v. Texas Department Criminal Justice
as 8:2014cv02790
Plaintiff:
David M. Amos
Defendant:
Texas Department Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. United States Government et al
as 8:2014mc00367
Plaintiff:
Keena Keith
Defendant:
United States Government, Department of Army, Department of Defense and others
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Ford et al
as 8:2014cv01790
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Janice Ford, Rudolph Ford, Jr., United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynolds v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2014cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gary I. Reynolds
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prison, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Holmes et al
as 8:2013cv01641
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Leroy Holmes, Byrdie Blizzard-Holmes, Kettering Community Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
