Cases 61 - 70 of 238
Peltier v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv13719
Plaintiff:
Charles Peltier
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, J. Ex., Floyd and others
Lamar Burton v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR BURTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director MDOC, MARY BERGHUIS, Warden, Warden, LRF, J. VERBONCOUER, Deputy Warden, LRF and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, et al.
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, et al.
Chester Hardy v. Lance Barbre, et al
as 15-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE BARBRE, RAYMOND WOODROW, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Williams #541415 v. Yunker et al
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Leshawn Williams #541415
Defendant:
Aaron Yunker, Brian Durand, Unknown Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, et al.
Michael Kitchen v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, et al
Williams v. Yunker et al
as 2:2015cv13061
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Williams
Defendant:
Aaron Yunker, Brian Durand, Bush and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Roosevelt-Lashawn
Thirdparty_defendant:
Aaron Yunker, Brian Durand, Bush and others
Cesar Valladolid v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESAR VALLADOLID
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. CLINE, Correctional Officer, DONALD WINSLEY, Counselor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
