Cases 61 - 70 of 494
Burt v. Deschutes River Holdings LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jared Burt
Defendant:
Deschutes River Holdings LLC and David Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brown v. Future Motion Inc.
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
David D Brown
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinkson v. The United State of America, et al.
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
David R Hinkson
Defendant:
The United State of America, Richard Tallman, Edward J Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seefeld(t) v. Gee et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Payton Shawn Seefeld(t)
Defendant:
David Gee, Govenor Brad Little, Donald J Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biro v. Mcauthor, et al.
as 2:2021cv00494
Defendant:
Joshua Mayes, Larry Mcauthor, Correy Mcauthor and others
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bannock County Commissioners et al
as 4:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
David K Hoskins
Defendant:
Bannock County Commissioners, Sheriff Manu, Deputy Minio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2021cv00446
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Defendant:
City of Boise, David Bieter, City of Boise Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00394
Petitioner:
David M. Laney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
