Cases 61 - 70 of 167
Tarrus D. Cunningham v. Department of Defense
as 2:2017mc00020
Petitioner:
Tarrus D. Cunningham
Respondent:
Department of Defense
John Thomas Christiana v. United States And Its Agencies et al
as 8:2017cv00089
Defendant:
21st Century Fox, John Brennan, Sylvia Mathews Burwell and others
CIA:
Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Christiana
DOD:
Department of Defense
HHS:
Department of Health and Human Services
DIG:
Dornin Investment Group
Davis et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv06258
Plaintiff:
Doris Davis and Marion Grant
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Finance and Accounting Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Arellano et al v. United States Army et al
as 2:2016cv02198
Defendant:
United States Army , United States Department of Defense, Javier Antonio Zamora and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Arellano and Maylyn Paniagua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc. v. Carter et al
as 2:2016cv02141
Defendant:
Ashton B. Carter and United States Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2016at01119
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Ashton B. Carter
Plaintiff:
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
John R. Livingston v. Department of Defense
as 5:2016mc00014
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Movant:
John R Livingston
John R Livingston v. Department of Defense
as 5:2016mc00016
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Movant:
John R Livingston
John R Livingston v. Department of Defense
as 5:2016mc00015
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Movant:
John R Livingston
John R Livingston v. Department of Defense
as 5:2016mc00013
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Movant:
John R Livingston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
