Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reynolds v. Cox Cable et al
as 8:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Community Telecast and Harold Reynolds
Defendant:
Cox Cable, Cox Communications and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Young v. County of Dawes, Nebraska et al
as 7:2013cv05002
Defendant:
County of Box Butte, County of Dawes and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Atem v. County of Lancaster et al
as 4:2013cv03017
Plaintiff:
Arok Atem
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, County of Lancaster and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2012cv00412
Defendant:
City of Auburn, John Does 1-10, Joshua Keadle and others
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atem v. County of Lancaster et al
as 4:2012cv03227
Plaintiff:
Arok Atem
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, County of Lancaster and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baumann et al v. Slezak et al
as 8:2012cv00383
Defendant:
AKI Trucking, Inc., John Does 1 - 10, Long Haul Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Baumann, Nancy R. Baumann and Donna J. Costley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
