Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Cobb v. Douglas County, State of Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv03898
Plaintiff:
Bundy Cobb
Defendant:
Douglas County, State of Georgia , Douglas County Board of Elections and Registration , Sylvanus L. Burney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Finch v. Superior Court, Douglas County et al
as 1:2014cv03788
Petitioner:
Toreanto Deyawn Finch
Respondent:
Superior Court, Douglas County and William McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farmer v. The Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2014cv03186
Plaintiff:
Kevin Farmer
Defendant:
The Georgia Department of Human Services and The Supremee Court of Douglas County, State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. The Douglas County School System et al
as 1:2014cv02192
Plaintiff:
Tonya Davis
Defendant:
The Douglas County School System and Gordon Pritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Knight v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv01670
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Vashone Knight
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office, LaDonna Schumaker and James Pedan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McFarlin v. Douglas County Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Clarence McFarlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Georgia, Phil Miller, City of Douglasville, Georgia and others
Presnell v. Douglas County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2013cv01771
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Presnell
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office, Phil Miller, Marco Antonio Miranda-Perez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
