Cases 61 - 70 of 126
MITCHELL v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2013cv06152
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, DASALLE and GROVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YAZID-MAZIN v. MCCORMICK et al
as 3:2013cv05783
Plaintiff:
MADEQ DEANDRE YAZID-MAZIN
Defendant:
KENNETH MCCORMICK, JAMES BENANTI, ANDREW C. CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'AMORE v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2013cv05661
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MICHEAL D'AMORE, JR.
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER, HOGAN, HEMINGWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Bristol-Myers Squib Company et al
as 3:2013cv05313
Plaintiff:
Lynn Faye Banks , Barbara A. House , Mary E. McMillan and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2013cv05048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, JOYCE PIERRE and ROBERT GROVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CICCHI
as 3:2013cv03707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CICCHI
as 3:2013cv03706
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOGO FACTORY FRANCHISING, INC. v. YING et al
as 3:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
YOGO FACTORY FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
EDMOND YING , NANCY CANON-YING and OMG FROYO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
ATNO et al v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 3:2013cv00384
Plaintiff:
KIM ATNO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, WARDEN EDMOND C. CICCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
