Cases 61 - 70 of 254
SHARMA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv02008
Plaintiff:
DHARMPAL SHARMA and SHIKHA SHARMA
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MISHRA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv02013
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Plaintiff:
NIHARIKA MISHRA , BISWAMOHAN MISHRA and R. M.
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
TURNER v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv02009
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURNER
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. HENDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff:
LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STEPHENSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01917
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON and LONNIE GENE VERNON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IBN-SADIIKA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH H. IBN-SADIIKA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANAMATHAREDDY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv01865
Plaintiff:
PRASAD KANAMATHAREDDY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
KINGSTON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01861
Plaintiff:
ROALSTON STEVENSON KINGSTON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
