Cases 61 - 70 of 350
Laclair v. McBride et al
as 1:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Laclair
Defendant:
McBride and Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKown v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00367
Defendant:
Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail, Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail Medical Department, Nurse Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Evans McKown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jason Evans Evans
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leyva v. Leyva et al
as 3:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Tracey Kemp, Lyndsay Newell, Cheryl Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Leyva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monzon v. Evans et al
as 7:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans, Melissa D. Sowers, Tammy Barbetto and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee et al v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
as 3:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
LeAnn K. Moran, Heather Z. Evans, Rosalind A. Chaplin and others
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Nottoway Correctional Center Medical Department, Providers, and Staff et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
R. Smith, Nurse Practitioner Bendall, P. McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans El v. Woodson
as 1:2021cv00346
Respondent:
John A. Woodson
Petitioner:
Frederick R. Evans El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Nexus Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Nexus Services, Inc., Richard Moore, Micheal Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
