Cases 61 - 70 of 426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00463
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webster v. The Travelers Indemnity Company
as 3:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Edward Eric Webster
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stidham v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00282
Respondent:
Colette S. Peters and State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Jason Edward Stidham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Progressive Universal Insurance Company v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
Progressive Universal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Colette M Luff and Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Edwards v. Bluett
as 2:2021cv00230
Petitioner:
Joshua Edwards
Respondent:
Troy Bluett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parkerson et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, John Doe 3, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Edwards, Nolan James Dabell, William J. Parkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Taylor and Timothy Darrell Young
Defendant:
Federal Government and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Bruns et al
as 3:2020cv02201
Defendant:
Edward Rose, Pete Bruns, Doug Sheppard and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marie Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. U.S. Federal Government
as 6:2020cv02124
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Government
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
