Cases 61 - 70 of 157
Akula Energy Ventures, LLC v. Gordon, et al.
as 6:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Akula Energy Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Earth By Design Inc. and Jim Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McMain v. Peters et al
as 2:2013cv01632
Defendant:
J. Bell, Dr. Elliot-Blakeslee, Collette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon McMain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Premo
as 6:2013cv01130
Petitioner:
Dennis Leroy Gordon
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexanderson v. Monroe et al
as 3:2013cv00813
Plaintiff:
Alvin Alexanderson
Defendant:
C-Lazy-K Ranch, Inc., Carolyn Dale Monroe and James Gordon Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Baugh v. Holder et al
as 3:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland Oregon, John Doe 1-2, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dillard v. The State of Oregon et al
as 1:2013cv00373
Defendant:
James Brissette, Stephen Campbell, Jeffrey Gaunt and others
Plaintiff:
C. Gordon Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gordon v. Franke
as 2:2013cv00052
Respondent:
Steven Franke
Petitioner:
Dennis Leroy Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fabre v. Hansen et al
as 3:2012cv02361
Defendant:
Hilario Arellanu, Washington Bakira, Deborah Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Marc Fabre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
