Cases 61 - 70 of 188
Mobley III v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Mobley III
Defendant:
Joseph Davis, Leroy Grimes, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Givens et al
as 5:2017cv01071
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Barnes
Defendant:
Joe Castillo, P. Chapa, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv02556
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott , Nathan Kleeb , Gabriella Earle and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. Davis
as 4:2017cv02482
Petitioner:
James Maurice Grimes
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. Livingston et al
as 4:2017cv02335
Plaintiff:
Roy Jones , Alice Jones and Lequetta Davis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Matt Barber, Joe A. Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Avis et al
as 3:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Avis, Budget and (Payless) Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beall v. Stephens et al
as 4:2017cv00033
Defendant:
Claudia N Alexander, LVN, Dr. Denise DeShield, Criselda B Gochicoa, RN and others
Plaintiff:
David Beall
Notice Only Party:
Leddocket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Allen Grimes, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ,et al
as 5:2017cv00573
Defendant:
Braden Barnes, Michael Burns, Thuy Frazier and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Skarpa Grimes, Michael Allen Grimes and M. Joe Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Harper v. Bell et al
as 2:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milan Harper
Defendant:
Oliver J Bell, Bryan Collier, Joe Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Bell et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milan Harper
Defendant:
Oliver J Bell, Bryan Collier, Joe Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
