Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Wallace et al v. GrubHub Holdings Inc.
as 1:2018cv04538
Defendant:
GrubHub Holdings Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carmen Wallace and Broderick Bryant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raef Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 18-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAEF LAWSON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, and in his capacity as Private Attorney General Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC. and GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
Cisneros Portillo et al v. Grubhub, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00873
Petitioner:
Miguel Cisneros Portillo , Cesar Tenorio , Eugenio Ortega Vasquez and others
Respondent:
Grubhub, Inc. and Great Lakes NY, NY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Altman v. GrubHub Inc
as 2:2017cv01926
Plaintiff:
Natalya Altman
Defendant:
GrubHub Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Najera et al v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02978
Petitioner:
Prisco Najera , Israel Fuentes , Cristobal Bravo and others
Respondent:
Grubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Fall Line Patents, LLC
Defendant:
Grubhub Holdings, Inc. and Grubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Amodeo v. GrubHub Inc.
as 1:2017cv01284
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Amodeo
Defendant:
GrubHub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Thomas Souran, et al v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc., et al
as 17-1320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS SOURAN, KELLY REARDON, ROY WILKIE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. and GRUBHUB, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
