Cases 61 - 70 of 497
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mohammed v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv05568
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mohammed v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv06054
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Clerk Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mohammed v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv06058
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Clerk Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hatch v. Preckwinkle et al
as 1:2020cv04341
Defendant:
Illinois Secretary of State Department of Administrative Hearings, Cook County, Illinois Secretary of State, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Hatch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gills v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2021cv04166
Plaintiff:
Jaryan Gills
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, . Decker, . Argo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2021cv04132
Plaintiff:
Jose Silva
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, . Garza, William Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samardzic v. A&T Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03839
Plaintiff:
RADMILLO SAMARDZIC and Radmillo Smardzic
Defendant:
A&T TRUCKING, LLC and Carl D Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Munoz et al
as 1:2021cv01152
Defendant:
. Faletti, . Miller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
