Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Murphy et al v. Annapolis Paint Company - Eastern Shore, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02408
Plaintiff:
David Mark Murphy and Ronald Terry Hawkins
Defendant:
Annapolis Paint Company - Eastern Shore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hawkins v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tesa Hawkins
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawkins v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 8:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tesa Hawkins
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC v. Chapolini Associates, et al
as 1:2009cv02386
Plaintiff:
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Defendant:
Chapolini Associates, 2010 Reservior Road Investors, LLC, Quad Partners Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hawkins v. Proctor Auto Service Center, LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01908
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hawkins
Defendant:
Proctor Auto Service Center, LLC, Natalie Proctor and Timothy Proctor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hawkins v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) et al
as 1:2009cv01122
Plaintiff:
William A. Hawkins and William A. Hawkins
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) and Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein & Blatt, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hawkins v. Chick et al
as 8:2009cv00661
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Hawkins
Defendant:
Russell E. Chick, Annette M. Leach, Charles Donaldson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. State of Maryland
as 1:2008cv02847
Plaintiff:
Harold Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv02736
Plaintiff:
Henry Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
