Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,254
Douglas Hoglan v. Glenn Youngkin
as 23-6907
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant / Appellee: GLENN YOUNGKIN and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Doljac v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00595
Petitioner: John Shannon Doljac
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00583
Plaintiff: Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Rick White, K. Almarade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demmerick Brown v. T. Coyner
as 23-6888
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee: TAMMY COYNER, Dental Assistant, WERNER WIEDEMANN, Dentist, K. SMITH, Institutional Physician and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6883
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6871
Petitioner: DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Anton Joshua v. Chadwick Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6860
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTON NELSON JOSHUA
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
McDowell v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00569
Petitioner: Roderick W. McDowell
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Bass v. Chadwick Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6847
Petitioner: KELLY DANIEL BASS
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent / Appellee: CHADWICK DOTSON
Stith v. Cabell
as 2:2023cv00426
Petitioner: Thomas D. Stith
Respondent: Beth Cabell and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?