Cases 61 - 70 of 197
Jones v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 6:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kent Hendrickson, Acree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Patterson et al
as 5:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy Leann Patterson, Paula Gayle Tipton, Donna Lynn Hughes and others
Cross_claimant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation , Any Unknown Heirs and Spouses of Heirs of Donnie G. Tipton, Sr., Any Unknown Spouse of Donnie G. Tipton, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cox v. Hughes
as 0:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Claude Raymond Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyra Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Hughes
as 3:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Tyra Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Red River Gorge Zipline, LLC
as 5:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Hughes and Laura Allen Hughes
Defendant:
Red River Gorge Zipline, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll v. Mink et al
as 6:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Donnie Hugh Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Mink and Laurel County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles et al v. Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
T.B.B. , N.H.S.B. , C.D.B. and others
Defendant:
Bourbon County Kentucky, Gary Wilson, Sheila Gant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilburn v. Hughes et al
as 0:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Kilburn
Defendant:
Tara Hughes and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilburn v. Hughes et al
as 3:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Kilburn
Defendant:
Tara Hughes and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Smith
as 0:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Hugh Russell Campbell
Respondent:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
