Cases 61 - 70 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Boone et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Alvin Boone, Brandon Hester, Lindsey Quisenberry and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC), Illinois Department of Human Services, Illinois Department of Veteran Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jennifer Dunkley v. AFSCME Local 2600, et al
as 21-2878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER A. DUNKLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2600, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, KIMBERLY PELTES and others
Jennifer Dunkley v. AFSCME Local 2600, et al
as 21-2833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER A. DUNKLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2600, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, KIMBERLY PELTES and others
Jennifer Dunkley v. AFSCME Local 2600, et al
as 21-2834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER A. DUNKLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2600, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, KIMBERLY PELTES and others
Peter Obazuaye v. Illinois Department of Human S, et al
as 21-2426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER O. OBAZUAYE
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, JOHN GORDON, DIANA HOGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
