Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Bank of New York Mellon v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2011cv00092
Defendant:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service , Advent Mortgage LLC and Jason A Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayers, L.P. v. Stewart et al
as 3:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Ayers, L.P.
Defendant:
David W Stewart, Stewart Manufacturing Corporation, United States of America Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America et al v. McClinton
as 2:2010cv02876
Petitioner:
United States of America and Kimberly Tate, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Aaron J McClinton
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Bateman et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00765
Plaintiff:
Rodger Bateman, Shannon Byrd, Rita Byrd and others
Defendant:
United States of America , U.S. Department of The Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FirstBank v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2010cv02578
Plaintiff:
FirstBank
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service , First Alliance Bank , James S. Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Faison v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2010cv00043
Petitioner:
Matthew James Faison, Jr.
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bunch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Roy D Bunch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chumpia v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2010cv02382
Plaintiff:
Bamrung P. Chumpia
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Shelby County, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Faison v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2010mc00001
Petitioner:
Matthew James Faison, Jr.
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Sauzedde et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2010mc00013
Plaintiff:
Rene Jean Sauzedde and Yael Sauzedde
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
