Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Prokofi Nozadze v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3587
Petitioner:
PROKOFI NOZADZE
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Beniamin Burzo v. US Dept Homeland Security, et al
as 17-3585
Petitioner:
BENIAMIN BURZO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Robert Irvin v. William Haynes, Jr., et al
as 17-5612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Senior United States District Judge, THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice
Lester Arambu v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3558
Petitioner:
LESTER RENE ARAMBU
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Jose Sanchez Bohorquez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3559
Petitioner:
JOSE GUSTAVO SANCHEZ BOHORQUEZ, ANDREA ANAYA GARCIA and NATHALIA SANCHEZ ANAYA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Rafael Alarcon-Monroy v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3543
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ALARCON-MONROY
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Alvaro Ramirez Castaneda v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-1630
Petitioner:
ALVARO EZEQUIEL RAMIREZ CASTANEDA, a/k/a Avardo Ramirez, a/k/a Alvaro Castaneda Ramirez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, U.S. Attorney General
Shahzad Raja v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3502
Petitioner:
SHAHZAD RAJA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Jose Saldana v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3504
Petitioner:
JOSE RANGEL SALDANA, aka Norberto Saldana-Rangel
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Angela Jovel-Torres, et al v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III
as 17-3418
Petitioner:
ANGELA DE LA PAZ JOVEL-TORRES and EMERSON ANTONIO VELASQUEZ-JOVEL
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
