Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Broadhead v. Olds et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Centavriad Olds, Brian Robinson, Sterlinc Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Omart et al
as 2:2014cv00917
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Parker Omart, Bonella, Joel Gilbert and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Broadhead et al
as 2:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott and M Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott, Evelgor Dorsett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Pedehel P. Martin, Benton Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Foster et al
as 2:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Foster, Aaron Lewis, Harrison and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Rene Mason, B. Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Headley et al
as 4:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Carter Davenport, Sherry Wood and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 2:2013cv00641
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Joseph H Headley, Jonathan Ragan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Collier et al
as 2:2012cv02685
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Raphael Collier, Rambo, S Coatney and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
