Cases 61 - 70 of 118
SANCHEZ v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv05272
Petitioner:
DEDMAS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Grondolsky
as 4:2009cv40178
Petitioner:
Armondo Johntel Cole
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bownes v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11673
Petitioner:
Marvis H. Bownes
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NAVA v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv04900
Petitioner:
NAVA MANUEL NAVA
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOFFENBERG v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv04784
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JUDE HOFFENBERG
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, RICHARD HERBIK, ROBIN HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guibilo v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11447
Petitioner:
Michael Guibilo
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUGHES v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv04346
Petitioner:
JOHN ERIC HUGHES
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VARGO v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv04260
Petitioner:
JAMES S. VARGO
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, SHEILA BROSIER, RAJA GILYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thornton v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11377
Petitioner:
Julian Matthew Thornton
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EICKLEBERRY v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv04057
Petitioner:
CHARLES EICKLEBERRY
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
