Cases 61 - 70 of 172
Luczak v. Coakley
as 3:2017cv00086
Petitioner:
Casey Luczak
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lovett v. Coakley
as 2:2017cv00099
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Petitioner:
Willie Clinton Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montague v. Coakley
as 5:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
William D. Montague
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Coakley
as 1:2017cv00127
Petitioner:
Vernon J. Smith, III
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hawkins v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv00080
Petitioner:
Charles Hawkins
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William Pumphrey v. Joe Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-6823
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden
Boynes v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv00079
Petitioner:
Darryl Boynes, Jr.
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holloway v. Coakley et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Holloway
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, Eric Howell, Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skinner v. Meyer, et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Shakir Malik Skinner
Defendant:
Christopher Meyer, Joe Coakley and M. D. Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2017cv00070
Petitioner:
Abdul Muhammad
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.