Cases 61 - 70 of 72
FRAMPTON v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as 3:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRAMPTON
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marino v. Nauyalis et al
as 1:2011cv22456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marino
Defendant:
Joseph Vincent Nauyalis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 4:2011mc00013
Plaintiff:
LECERE CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, Ltda., v. Pinacle Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv20476
Plaintiff:
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, LTDA.
Defendant:
Pinacle Trading Corp., Marco Ramirez, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHISBY v. DOE 1, et al
as 5:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
KELLY WHISBY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHISBY v. DOE
as 5:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
KELLY WHISBY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomblin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Tomblin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Hicks, Corrections Officer Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obufa v. Walmart et al
as 6:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
Tom Obufa
Defendant:
Walmart, City of Holly Hill Florida Police Department, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Enriquez v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Frank Rafael Enriquez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nike, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2008cv01181
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
