Cases 61 - 70 of 118
FRAMPTON v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as 3:2011cv05564
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRAMPTON
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVE v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 3:2011cv03765
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLIDAY v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2011cv02915
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. HOLIDAY, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAOYE v. D.H.S. et al
as 3:2011cv01969
Plaintiff:
AKINTOYE LAOYE
Defendant:
D.H.S., I.C.E., OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUKOFF et al v. NEW BUFFALO CORP. et al
as 1:2011cv01752
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LUKOFF and SHELLY LUKOFF
Defendant:
NEW BUFFALO CORP. , BUFFALO TOOLS, GUARDIAN TOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WHITE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv05485
Plaintiff:
KASHIEF WHITE
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TENAGLIA v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv04295
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TENAGLIA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIPHANT v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03782
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND OLIPHANT
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAMARA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAMARA, JR. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
