Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Warden FNU Lasada, Officer John Doe 4 721cv33, Officer John Doe 3 721cv33 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Lyft Inc doing business as Lyft Drives Texas Inc and John Doe 3:21-cv-970
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Craft et al
as 6:2021cv00334
Defendant:
Sheriff John Doe 3, Major John Doe 1, Lt. FNU Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Vivint Inc., Dr. M. Burrows, Wal-Mart Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh, Ph.D. v. Extended Stay America, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01128
Defendant:
John Doe 3, ESH Hospitality Inc., Bruce N. Haase and others
Plaintiff:
Ravindra Singh, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dilwali v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv03730
Plaintiff:
Sunita Dilwali
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Ector County Detention Center, et al
as 7:2020cv00224
Plaintiff:
Arvae Mavrick Walters
Defendant:
Ector County Detention Center, Officer (FNU) Medrano, EMT John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2020cv00124
Defendant:
John Doe Jail Guard #2, John Doe #5, John Doe Deputy Supervisor #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Doe (1-2) et al
as 6:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Major FNU Lighten, John Doe, 3 and John Doe (1-2)
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. Al-Qaeda et al
as 3:2020cv00681
Plaintiff:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, John Doe 7 and others
Defendant:
The Taliban, The Haqqani Network and Al-Qaeda
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
