Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Smith v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2010cv02007
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas, Jr. v. Wolfe
as 1:2010cv01825
Plaintiff:
Ellis Richard Douglas, Jr.
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
Clifton L Gaither
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe, David Blumbery and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulford-El v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Errol Douglass Fulford-El
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe and Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Chase v. The Prior and Present DOC Comm
as 10-6094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE PRIOR AND PRESENT DOC COMMISSIONERS OF CORRECTIONS, KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Warden and others
Collins v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2009cv02663
Petitioner:
Dana Russell Collins
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Wolfe
as 8:2009cv02364
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitchell
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2009cv01458
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitchell
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe, Mail Room, Personells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2009cv00425
Petitioner:
Michael Lawrence Pratt
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren Chase v. The Prior and Present DOC Comm
as 09-6225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN CHASE and WARREN CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE PRIOR AND PRESENT DOC COMMISSIONERS OF CORRECTIONS, KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
