Cases 61 - 70 of 77
McConico v. Price et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00414
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Joseph Headley, W. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Presley v. LaTonya Scott, et al
as 16-11780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WALTER PRESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LATONYA SCOTT, Lt., CARL SANDERS, Captain, KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, Commissioner and others
Townsend v. Headley et al
as 1:2015cv02256
Plaintiff:
John D Townsend
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Morris and MacMunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00855
Plaintiff:
John D. Townsend
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Sgt. Morris and Mrs. MacMunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waddle v. Bentley et al
as 1:2015cv01451
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Waddle
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Jeff Dunn and Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Smoot et al
as 2:2015cv01300
Plaintiff:
Rodrick McPherson
Defendant:
Marshall Smoot, Denour Oden and Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Headley et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne George
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Brian H Roberts and Morris
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne George
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Brian H. Roberts and Sergeant Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Headley et al
as 4:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Carter Davenport, Sherry Wood and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
