Cases 61 - 70 of 1,091
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW, Audrey J. Baltoff, Frances Mae Musgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Glynn v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Glynn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coyle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Coyle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alchin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Alchin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
Carmen Johnson
Defendant:
David Wilson, Jerrod Grimes, Barbara Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Workman v. Harris & Harris, LTD
as 2:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Workman
Defendant:
Harris & Harris, LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
