Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Peyton v. Offshore Liftboats, LLC
as 2:2011cv00060
Defendant:
Offshore Liftboats, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lamont Peyton
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hairston v. Young
as 2:2010cv01339
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Hairston
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clay v. Nelson Coleman Correctional Center et al
as 2:2010cv01590
Plaintiff:
Clifton Lamont Clay
Defendant:
Nelson Coleman Correctional Center, Nelson Coleman Cor. Center Medical Staff and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 6:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
Lamont Mathews
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dotie v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lamont Dotie
Defendant:
Warden Forcht Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Means v. Huff et al
as 5:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lamont Means
Defendant:
Angie Huff and Jaime Fussell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Engelhardt et al
as 2:2009cv08749
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lamont Means
Defendant:
Kurt D. Engelhardt, Louisiana Department of Corrections, Unidentified Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Adger et al
as 5:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lamont Means
Defendant:
Levy Lee Adger, Patrick Gilliam and Tawana Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Alliance Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08536
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Brooks, Lamonte Brooks, Dana Haywood-Brooks and others
Defendant:
Alliance Homes, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
