Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Couch et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00955
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Couch , Alfredo Diaz , Marcella Buter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
American Modern Select Insurance Company v. Lacey et al
as 4:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
American Modern Select Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lamar Lacey and Tenisha Lacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Quarles v. Bowersox
as 4:2013cv01089
Petitioner:
Lamar D. Quarles, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. USA
as 4:2013cv00858
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Kevin Lamar Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. National Note of Utah, LC et al
as 4:2013mc09013
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Receiver:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
National Note of Utah, LC and Wayne LaMar Palmer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Rolf v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamar Rolf, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Social Services and Jackson County Family Services Division
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Thomas v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv01619
Petitioner:
Winfred Lamar Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pearson v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Pearson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Crawford v. Dragan
as 4:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamar Crawford
Defendant:
Diane L. Dragan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
