Cases 61 - 70 of 362
(PC)Garcia v. Swain et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
Vicente Garcia
Defendant:
S. Swain, B. Eskew, D. Stebbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Cleveland v. B. Min, et al
as 19-17598
Defendant / Appellee:
B. D. MIN, Pastor, M. VOONG, Chief Office of Appeals and J. VILA, Appeals Examiner, Office of Appeals
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN VERNORD CLEVELAND
Joseph George v. USA, et al
as 19-56528
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON CONGE, Deputy, JOHN DOE, Owner Mission Valley Orn and Marillo Facial Surgery, MARVIN MALECHA, President New School of Architecture and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE
Edgar Canchola v. M. Voong et al
as 2:2019cv10800
Defendant:
M. Voong, Lieutenant S. Brookman, P. Denny and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Canchola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv08201
Defendant:
A. Maxfield, Ron Davis, A.W.R. Bloomfield and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Black v. M. Voong et al
as 2:2019cv10444
Defendant:
M. Voong, R. C. Johnson, T Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Black, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv01713
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, A. Shaw, David Constante and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Liu et al
as 2:2019cv02437
Defendant:
Steven M. Bartlett, Charles C. Pierce, David Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Neuschmid, et al.
as 3:2019cv07490
Defendant:
R. Mitchel, W. Swkovich, M. Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Toriano Germaine Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. Difuntorum et al
as 2:2019cv02272
Plaintiff:
John Gilbert Mendoza
Defendant:
A. Petty, M. McComas, G. Matteson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
