Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Discount Tobacco City & Lotter, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5234
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: DISCOUNT TOBACCO CITY & LOTTERY, INC., LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, NATIONAL TOBACCO COMPANY, L.P. and others
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration and others
Discount Tobacco City & Lotter, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: DISCOUNT TOBACCO CITY & LOTTERY, INC., LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, NATIONAL TOBACCO COMPANY, L.P. and others
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration and others
Smoking Everywhere, Inc., et al v. FDA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5032
Plaintiff - Appellee: Smoking Everywhere, Inc. and John F. Banzhaf, Executive Director of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Sottera, Inc., doing business as Njoy
Defendant - Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01924
Plaintiff: GARY HULL, RIMA E. LAIBOW, SUSANNE FIELD and others
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Other Statutes None
ALLERGAN, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01879
Plaintiff: ALLERGAN, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET HAMBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Civil Rights None
KRETEK INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01835
Plaintiff: KRETEK INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET HAMBURG, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01810
Plaintiff: WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Commonwealth Brands, Inc. et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00117
Plaintiff: Commonwealth Brands, Inc., Commonwealth Brands, Inc., Commonwealth Brands, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States of America, United States Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Civil Rights None
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 09-5308
Plaintiff - Appellee: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Movant - Appellant: Apotex, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Apotex, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?