Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 145
Fischer Tucker, IV v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1787
Petitioner / Appellant: FISCHER TUCKER, IV
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Parks #749266 v. Burgess We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00823
Petitioner: Marquisse Davon Parks #749266
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatchett #198863 v. Burgess We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00822
Petitioner: Alfred Hatchett #198863, Jr.
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey PrestonIn re: Harvey Preston
as 22-1683
Petitioner: In re: HARVEY LEE PRESTON
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Stanley Daniels
as 22-1632
Petitioner: In re: STANLEY EARL DANIELS
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Tucker #654194 v. Burgess We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00642
Petitioner: Fischer Tucker #654194
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton #678615 v. Burgess et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff: Bernard Clifton #678615
Defendant: Michael Burgess, Unknown Erway and Unknown McShane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton #866701 v. Burgess We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00517
Petitioner: Michael Germaine Burton #866701
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalvin WashingtonIn re: Kalvin Washington
as 22-1469
Petitioner: In re: KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
In re: Michael Gresham
as 22-1466
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL GRESHAM
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, named as Barry McLemore

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?