Cases 61 - 70 of 90
PETTAWAY v. GENERAL ATTORNEY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2011cv01596
Petitioner:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Respondent:
GENERAL ATTORNEY OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOLINO v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv01582
Petitioner:
JOHN ORTENZIO FOLINO
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY (PA.) DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BELL v. SKENDALL et al
as 1:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BELL
Defendant:
JOHN SKENDALL, MICHAEL HARLOW, WENDELL PAZT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEINMAN v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2011cv00309
Petitioner:
JUSTIN LEE STEINMAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THORNTON v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv07468
Petitioner:
DONALD THORNTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBET and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARLOW, DORINA VARNER, MR. LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Harlow et al
as 1:2011cv01909
Petitioner:
Greg Lee
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCWILLIAMS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv01214
Petitioner:
CONRAD A. MCWILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. HESS et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WHITE
Defendant:
VERONICA J. HESS and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. HARLOW
as 1:2011cv00106
Petitioner:
JAMES J. JACKSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
