Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Ramirez et al v. 3 Margaritas XVIII, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01357
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ramirez , Guillermo Munoz and Marcos Villsenor
Defendant:
3 Margaritas XVIII, Inc., Iguana, Inc., Tetitan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carrillo et al v. Castle, Stawiarki, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Alfonso A. Carrillo, Nora G. Gonzalez Cuevas, Jaime Escobedo and others
Defendant:
Castle, Stawiarki, LLC, Lawrence Castle, Government Technology Systems (GTS) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Houston v. Daniels et al
as 1:2010cv02469
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
Daniels, Hutchings, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. McCulloch et al
as 1:2010cv02173
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
J. McCulloch, Borja, Justin Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houston v. Daniels et al
as 1:2010cv02098
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, W. Hutchings, A. W. Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. Zavara
as 1:2009cv02366
Plaintiff:
Mario Rivera Munoz
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Smelser
as 1:2009cv02367
Plaintiff:
Mario Rivera Munoz
Defendant:
Richard Smelser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lara et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Micaela Lara and Cosme Lara Munoz
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Munoz-Marquez v. Wilner
as 1:2009cv00887
Petitioner:
Javier Munoz-Marquez
Respondent:
J. M. Wilner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
