Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00033
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jochem v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv01112
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Neil Jochem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Van Valin et al v. Google, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00557
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Mertz and Vicki Van Valin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Evanston Insurance Company v. Healthy Heart Review, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03043
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Glenda Gearin, Neil Gearin and Healthy Heart Review, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Neil v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2010cv00429
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Anderson v. Thomas
as 3:2009cv01242
Petitioner:
Robert Neil Anderson
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shane v. United State Secret Service
as 3:2009cv01231
Plaintiff:
Neil Shane
Defendant:
United State Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Parker v. Jones
as 3:2009cv00887
Plaintiff:
Traci Parker
Defendant:
Neil Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00726
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
