Cases 61 - 70 of 136
Adley-White et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Veronica Adley-White , Cletus Agomuo , Ronald Averhart and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nichols v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
as 7:2015cv01398
Plaintiff:
Timothy A Nichols
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2015cv00610
Plaintiff:
Angel Nichole Scott
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ethridge v. Nichols Aluminum- Alabama, LLC
as 5:2014cv02126
Plaintiff:
Ferlin Ethridge
Defendant:
Nichols Aluminum- Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Nichols v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2014cv02010
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lynn Nichols
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nuckols v. Stevens et al
as 2:2014cv00705
Plaintiff:
Nichole Nuckols
Defendant:
Elizabeth Virginia Stevens and Brian Craig Scapecchi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fike v. Nichols Aluminum- Alabama, LLC
as 2:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Scotty Fike
Defendant:
Nichols Aluminum- Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Batts et al v. Mid South Waffles, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01946
Plaintiff:
Vicky Batts , Cheryl Pucket , Megan Desiree Miller and others
Defendant:
Mid South Waffles, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
