Cases 61 - 70 of 236
LAWSON v. MENTEER et al
as 1:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
MENTEER , KIMERLE , DICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. OVERMYER et al
as 5:2018cv01397
Petitioner:
ANDREW K. GONZALEZ
Respondent:
OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OLSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 3:2018cv00056
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN OLSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, OBERLANDER, SAWTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv00373
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN OLSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. ERIE STATE PAROLE et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant:
ERIE STATE PAROLE and MICHAEL D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
THORPE T. BRADLEY
Defendant:
OVERMYER and PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv00332
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JAMES MORGAN
Respondent:
MICHEAL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALI v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv01074
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA ALI
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
