Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01089
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01091
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01085
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv01053
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Peabody Energy Corporation v. EPA
as 17-1035
Petitioner: Peabody Energy Corporation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
White Stallion Energy Center v. EPA
as 12-1100
Intervenor: Chase Power Development, LLC, American Public Health Association, State of North Carolina and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Chest Physicians, Richard J. Lazarus, Oliver A. Houck and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: White Stallion Energy Center, LLC
Peabody Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 15-1438
Petitioner: Peabody Energy Corporation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01611
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01590
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Francis v. Peabody Energy Corporation
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff: Samuel S. Francis
Defendant: Peabody Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?